Interesting story on The Guardian about ITV calling for top slicing of the licence fee.
ITV wants a fund set up, allowing broadcasters to bid for funds to support their news operations.
It’s an interesting argument – the actual submission to parliament is very interesting.
ITV points out it spends £100 million a year on news. Sounds like a lot, but it’s trifling compared to the BBC.
As anyone who’s looked into this knows, there’s very little publicly available information about how much the BBC spends on news. The £45 million figure is often quoted – but that’s merely the operational costs of the BBC News Channel. You also need to add in newsgathering, BBC World, and Nations and Regions plus the costs of the bulletins, Newsnight and BBC Breakfast. And that’s just TV – what about radio new, 5 Live and the World Service?
The actual figure for news could easily be ten times what’s spent on the news channel.
But the really stand out stat for me was the BARB quote:
each adult watched an average of around 114 hours of national or international news on television in 2012, of which around 80% was on the BBC. The next closest is ITV with 13% share of viewing, with Sky News in third place with 6%.
That is a disaster for ITV.
Forget the comparison with the BBC for a moment, ITV is only recording twice as much news viewing as Sky News. Sky News is a brilliant product – but it doesn’t deliver mass audiences and the viewership is notoriously fickle. It may well be that there’s more to that stat than meets the eye, and I’m going to have a look into it. But on first reading, it’s hard to under-estimate how badly it suggests ITV has mismanaged its news brand.
Perhaps it shouldn’t have canned the ITV News Channel.