I’m not going to rehearse the debate about TV election debates; I’ve made clear I think they should happen and will happen in the short campaign.
But I think it’s worth noting that in trying to do David Cameron’s bidding in scuppering the debates, Craig OIiver seems to have managed to achieve the worst of all worlds.
Cameron consistently said he thought they sucked the life out of the 2010 campaign – although politicians are always likely to say this about debates they haven’t won.
Still, the Prime Minister’s determination not to let them take place again has led to a confrontation with the broadcasters at precisely the wrong point in the electoral calendar.
I know Craig from ITN and he’s a smart operator. But it’s clear he thought the broadcasters would back down when faced with a point-blank refusal from No 10.
That strategy has blown up in his face because of a surprisingly firm response from the broadcasters.
Now Labour’s chicken charge is sticking, it’s getting traction with the public, and that can only get worse from now on.
If Cameron doesn’t take part in the debates, he’s a chicken. If he does take part, he’s a flip-flop chicken.
Downing Street’s only hope for a way out of the impasse is a failure of nerve and splits among the broadcasters to emerge. Cue Lord Grade.